Recently I have read the following book. Its main points are:
Book
title: Seraphim, Franziska. 2006. War Memory and Social Politics in Japan ,
1945- 2005.
Cambridge , Mass. :
Harvard
University Asia
Center .
Main
points:
Introduction:
- two events had framed Japan ’s history of war memory. First,
that question of war memory and postwar responsibility had been a part of
public life in Japan
from the end of war into the 21st century. War memory developed
together with the particular and divergent approaches to postwar democracy.
Democracy had shifted, so did memory in public life. War memory remained
fragmented yet it was closely woven into the political structure. (4). Second,
even if war memory implicitly shaped the way internal political battles were
contested, it rarely guided postwar politics explicitly on the state level.(5)
Even while the two events depicted here addressed Japanese domestic audience,
they were informed by global circumstances in crucial ways.(5)
- this book traces the social politics of war
memory in Japan
from the defeat in 1945 to the beginning of the new millennium. It draws upon
history of five prominent civic organizations from the political spectrum that
were at the forefront of this struggle: the Association of Shinto Shrines, the
Association of War-Bereaved Families, the Japan Teachers’ Union, the
Japan-China Friendship Association, and the Memorial Society for the
Student-Soldiers Killed in the War (Wadatsumikai).(7)
- the Association of Shinto Shrines was an
umbrella organization that worked with the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and
the Imperial Household Agency. It was crucial in keeping in public view the
problem of the ‘Emperor system’. (9)
-another conservative interest group was the Japan
Association of War-Bereaved Families which lobbied LDP representatives and the
Health and Welfare Ministry for state recognition. (9) On the political left, the Japan Teacher’s
Union (JTU) sought to diminish the power of the bureaucracy. It saw the
bureaucracy as a continuation of wartime militarism and opposed over the system
of textbook approval and school curricula decision etc. (9)
- a progressive interest group, the Japan -China
Friendship Association, sought to improve the Japanese relations with the PRC.
(9-10). A small but influential peace group was the
Japan Memorial Society for the Students Killed in the War known as Wadatsumikai. This group organized high
school and university students and teachers around a pacifist critique of
contemporary politics. It complied and edited many editions of the book
entitled “Listen to the Voices from the Deep”. (10)
- by the mid-1950s, these five organizations had
established themselves as special interest groups dominating the political
contest over the memory of war and its aftermath.(10) Each association represented a distinct stance
on war memory. The Association of Shinto Shrine and the Association for War
Bereaved Families centered their tactics on resuming aspects of wartime system.
The Japan Teacher’s Union , the Japan-China
Friendship Association and the Wadatsumikai
opposed the continuation of the political structure that supported militarism.
Wadatsumikai activists insisted
on a universal humanist pacifism. (11)
- the structure of this book reflects the main
phases in Japan ’s
history on war memory. Part I
describes how these five most prominent political interest groups were formed.
They represented different stance over the war memory. They ranged from far
right to radical left. (13) Part II
analyzes different aspects of public memory as they merged in the changing
context that was connected to specific political controversies. The social
politics of war memory remained tied to issues of bureaucratic control over
school curricula, textbook, and the official celebration of the war dead at
Yasukuni Shrine. These controversies revealed the shifting parameters of the memory debated in public life which was influenced
by generational changes in the
second post war decade, by the international
context of the 1960s, and also by the struggle over the official
custodianship of memory since the 1970s.(13) Part
III documents the most significant shift in Japan ’s history of memory. From the
1980s on the interest-based, domestic politics began to engage a global,
right-based approach to memory and restitution. International dimension could no longer be ignored. (14)
All five groups surveyed here had continued
actively to participate in public life up to the present; each group was
nationally organized, with regional and local chapters. (15)
- in organization, each group employed
strategies to which war memory was central.
Some points were noted: first, being a Shinto priest or an elementary
school teacher did not necessarily mean that one shared the same war
experience. The establishment of a Shinto organization or teacher’s labor union
could involve ideological consideration, and required an articulation of the
past and present realities with which potential members could identify. (16).
- second, organizations competed for a share of
public attention by positioning themselves as leaders of democratic changes.
Initially they targeted the common people. (16) Third, organizations located themselves on the
emerging political map of postwar Japan vis-à-vis the occupation
authorities. They had to adjust their activities in response to political
changes. (17)
-fourth, each civic group formed networks with
political parties and other organizations to establish its interest in the
political arena and each benefited from the political power of larger
organization. As the political system coalesced into two dominant parties in
the first half of the 1950s, organizations became identified with a particular
stance on contemporary issues, including views of the war. (17)
- as organizations such as the ultraconservative
Association of Shinto Shrines and the Association of War-Bereaved Families
successfully lobbied state institution on behalf of their cause, left-liberal
groups positioned themselves in opposition to the state. War memory organized
along a left-right divide. (20)
- the dominant pattern of contention over both
the war-time and the postwar was remained locked in a dynamic that pitted
(liberal) citizens against the (conservative) state. One landmark was the
beginning of the textbook trials in 1965 over the legality of textbook
censorship. (24)
- the five organizations competed with one
another for public space to present what they considered to be the essential
legacies of war. (24) With the loosening of institutionalized
political alliances at the end of the long conservative hegemony by the LDP,
there was a growing interaction of local and national politics. There was an
emerging public that focused attention on war memory, as both a political issue
and a framework for historical analysis. (25)
- as the Chinese and South Korean government
discovered political capital in the war memory issues, they began to monitor Japanese
official gestures in endorsing an unapologetically nationalist view of the war.
(26)
- emperor Hirohito’s death in 1989 ended the
Showa period; the fall of the Berlin Wall in the same year, the collapse of the
long hegemony of the conservative LDP in 1993 together marked a pivotal point
in the history of memory in Japan. The issue of war, and postwar responsibility
for Japan ’s war conduct in
Asia became tied to the politics of redefining Japan ’s position in the world. This
new beginning catapulted Japan ’s
unresolved war responsibility into the political limelight. (26)
- the Persian Gulf War in 1991 led the US to demand for Japan ’s’ active participation. At
the center stood the Japan ’s
constitutional and the legal position of the Self-defense Force (SDF). The “PKO Bill” allowed overseas
deployment of the SDF. (27)
- in 2005 a wave of anti-Japanese mass protest
across China
was unprecedented in scale. Japan ’s
active campaign to gain a permanent seat on the UN Security council formed one specific
issue of conflict. In Japan
the constitutional revision of Article 9 appeared to be a real possibility.
(30)
(to be continued)
沒有留言:
張貼留言