Recently I have read the following book. Its main points are:
Book
title: Sasaki-Uemura, Wesley. 2001. Organizing the Spontaneous: Citizen Protest
in Postwar Japan .
Honolulu : University of Hawaii
Press.
Main
points:
- citizen movement articulated new idea of
political subjectivity. This book seeks to present a fundamentally different
perspective on the process of the movement by examining four different
citizen’s groups that took part in the Anpo protest: The Mountain Range, the
Poets of Oi, the Grass Seeds, and the Voice-less Voices. (3)
- the Mountain Range showed the importance of
the historical context, specifically the specter of WWII to the protesters. The
ruling party seemed intended to bring the warring days back to Japan .
The Poets of Oi illustrated a crucial organizational context for the movement.
The foundation of the group was the culture circles. The glass Seeds showed the
importance of new sectors and constituency of the participants, in particular
the women. (4) The Voiceless Voice showed the importance of ideas and values in
mobilizing protesters. Their protests manifested a political philosophy based
on the citizen as the subject of political engagement. Citizen’s movement
shifted the emphases from ideology to action that became the organization’s
principle. (5)
- the analysis presented in the book began with
the premises that the Anpo protest was not monolithic or homogeneous. It was
ideologically and organizationally diverse. (6) The book did no rely on
official communiqués but instead tried to present the participant’s own voice.
(7)
- there were two main reasons that made it
difficult to define the characteristics of new social movements. One was the
wide range of the groups; the other was a major paradigm shift seen in the new
social movement theory in the past three decades.
- the appearance of new social movement had been
taken as an indication that, as Stuart Hall wrote, “Socialist man with one
mind, one set of interests, one project, is dead.”(9) The new social movement
identified different subject – whether citizens, local resident, or people who
suffer discrimination. In Japan
it developed around a plethora of issues, arising in responses to the rapid
economic growth and the state’s attempt to establish a ‘managed society’. (9)
- the question of multiple historicities was
important to the formation and activities of the groups examined in this book.
Protests implied a struggle over histories and who would be the custodian of
the past [in Carol Gluck’s words]. The protesters had to historicize their
situation. (14) The contest over historicity was crucial to understand the Anpo
era movements.
Ch.2:
The security treaty was signed in 1951. From 1959 to the fall of 1960, about 16
million Japanese engaged in protest against this Security treaty. (16) The
protests had been called the most important post war confrontation between
democratic forces and traditional paternalism in Japanese politics. (17)
-citizen groups often referred to their own
participation in the protests as ‘spontaneous’, to denote that they were
self-motivated rather than impulsive or instinctual. (21)
- four factors that had not received enough
attention in the past should be highlighted to account for the level of citizen
participation. First, the specter of WWII; second, new channels for involvement
had arisen; many came out from the circle movement. Third, it was the
increasing presence of women. Fourth was the development of citizen ethos that
placed the citizen rather than the proletariat as the subject or agent of
historical changes. (24)
- the Anpo generation acutely felt the traumas
of Japan ’s
defeat in WWII and was incensed by the instantaneous ‘conversion’ to democracy
of teachers and community elders. This Anpo generation had their
disillusionment with the Japan
Communist Party over the latter’s ideological flip-flops and the suppression of
dissidents. (35)
- Kanba’s death during a protest was deeply
shocking to all who were involved in the protest. First, the nature of the
protest was legalistic. The protesters were exercising their right to petition
the government. The fact that Kanba was a student at Tokyo University
reinforced the shock. The most shocking thing was that it was a woman who had
been killed. Women accounted for only 15 percent of the student population at Tokyo University .
She was an officer in Zengakuren. (49)
- Ch. 3.
- one of the key instruments that prompted a reassessment of people’s WWII
responsibility was a book published in 1949 called “Listen to the voices of
Wadatsumi: Writing of Japanese students killed in the war”. Numerous reading
groups formed throughout the country that used the book to reassess their
experience of the War through the thoughts of these soldiers. (63). One person
who was influenced by the reading groups was the founder of the Mountain Range,
Shiratori Kunio. (64) In 1947 Shiratori and his friends started a magazine
called Nameless Flower. They changed the name to Mountain Range in 1950. (64)
The magazine kept records of ordinary people’s lives that were more
heterogeneous and came from different occupations and locales. (68)
- Mountain Range reformed in 1956. Their members
communicated primarily in writing and since the groups were so spread out, they
began to make plan to get everyone together. (69). They saw themselves mainly
as a researcher and writing circle. (71)
- the Mountain Range did not make any resolution
about Anpo, even when the treaty was forcibly ratified on May 19 or when Kanba
was killed on June 15. (76) Members’ description of the Anpo protests tended to
emphasize their heterogeneity in the forms of action, the different locations
in which they took place. (77) Members had continued to meet as a whole group
once every two years, always in a different location. (77)
- the group’s mission of chronicling people from
various walks of life and spreading their work through small scale
communications networks had spawned several publishing ventures. Their Tokyo group in particular
had many members connected with the publishing world. (78)
- for the Anpo generation, the day of Japan ’s
surrender was the beginning of their lives, 1945 was the year zero. It afforded
the chance to construct a new system on top of the old one razed in the
bombing. For them, rebirth took placed in radically personal terms. To survive,
they had to take personal responsibility for the way they were in order to
effect changes under their new circumstance. (80)
(to be continued)
沒有留言:
張貼留言