Recently I have read the following book Its main points are:
Book
title: Leo Ching. 2001. Becoming “Japanese”: Colonial Taiwan and the Politics of Identity
Formation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Main
points:
-ch. 5 –
“here I am interested in reconstituting two crucial issues of
colonial/postcolonial studies: identity and historicity. In this chapter,
through a contextualized reading of the orphan of Asia, I argue that the
reconstitution of consciousness offers a more historical and thus critical
alternative in conceptualizing colonial violence than the politics of
identity.”(176)
- the book argues that “the novel opens up a larger
historical canvas that depicts the irreducible colonial-national-local
triangulation between Japan, China, and Taiwan throughout the Japanese colonial
period. The orphan of Asia presents an
allegory of Taiwan’s gradual ‘coming into being’ with the intensification of colonial
rule and its disillusion with Chinese nationalism.”(176)
-“the difference between Chen and Sung is stark. For
Chen, the ‘orphan mentality’ is an impediment to the channeling of a Taiwanese
identity into a grander Chinese identity. For Sung, on the contrary, the orphan
signifies the very essence of Taiwanese-ness, the signifier that severs itself
from both national (China) and colonial (Japan) representations through the
sentiment of rejection and abandonment.”(184)
沒有留言:
張貼留言