Recently I have read the following book. A book summary and my comments are:
Book title: Kondo, K. Dorinne. 1990. Crafting Selves: Power, Gender, and Discourses of Identity in a
Japanese Workplace. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Book summary
Dorinne Kondo, a Japanese American
anthropologist with a very Japanese appearance, embedded herself in a working
class suburb in Tokyo and worked in a confectionary factory owned by Sato (the
Sato factory) to do her field research for this book. She picked this small
size factory because, in her time,
99.4% of all firms in Japan fell into this category which employed 75.8% of
Japan’s workers. This category was known as the middle-small size companies (p.50). She developed her research with the theme of
personhood, work, and family by asking a question: How did the people she knew
crafted themselves and their lives within the shifting fields of power and
meaning, and how did they do so in a particular situation and within a particular historical and cultural
context (p.11). As a
rhetorical/theoretical strategy, she used the first-person voice to describe
her living environment to highlight how language was related to the production
of ‘selves’ (pp.25-6). By
experimentation with multiple shifting voice, she undertook a project to
de-centre the de-essentialize selves, focusing on the ways people constructed
themselves (p.43).
Kondo claims that to regard ‘selves’
as a coherent and seamless bounded was an illusions (p.14). While doing research in Japan she had two
identities: a researcher from America (the duty was to pursuit knowledge as a female
sensei) and a daughter (adopted) of a Japanese family where she was residing
(carrying duty and responsibility to the family) (p.14). Kondo admits that while writing this book, the
crafting of her own identity, and the crafting of the identities of her
Japanese friends, relatives, co-workers and acquaintances that she met during
her stay in Japan were the complicated outcome of power-fraught negotiations
between ‘self’ and ‘others’ (p.24).
She explains that one reason why she picked ‘crafting self’ as the book title was because identity was not a
static object, but a creative process. Therefore crafting selves was an ongoing
process, and that crafting selves implied a concept of agency: it was human who
created, constructed, worked on, and enacted on it (p.48).
Quoting previous works on ‘self’ by
other scholars such as Mauss, Saussure and Derridean, she laid out the
background on the subject (pp.35-36). Kondo also provides a critic on recent works
done by younger scholars such as Richard Shweder, White and Kirkpatrick, and
Valentine Daniel (pp.37-39). On the
basis these previous researches, Kondo led us to question the ways how the anthropological
literature had re-inscribed fixity, unity, boundedness; and insulated the
‘self’ from the play of power relations (p.42). The purpose of the book was to see how selves in
the plural were constructed variously in various situations, how these constructions
could be complicated and enlivened by multiplicity and ambiguity, and how they
shaped, and were reshaped by relations of power (p.43).
Kondo divides the book in to three
parts. In part one, through outlining the political, economic and historical context,
she describes the location of the Sato factory which was a small, family-owned
firm with about 30 employees. Then she focuses on an extraordinary experience
at an ethic training retreat where the Sato workers were sent there to take courses to become better human being and
better servants of the company. Part two discussed about the living meaning of
family for the people known to the author. Then it explained how Sato, the
owner of the firm, tried to create a ‘family’ atmosphere in the factory. Kondo
shows how workers reproduced the concept of ‘company as family’ to work again
Sato. Part three looked into the problematic construction of gendered work
identities on an ‘individual’ level. Using the perspective of a male artisan
and the female part-time workers, Kondo highlights the notions of identity, and
shows that individual identities were contextually constructed (p.47).
Kondo concludes that the complex and
often paradoxical effects of gender drew our attention to the multiplicity of
possible points at which dominant cultural forms might be contested. They
underlined the always unpredictable and incomplete nature of resistance and the
impossibility of constructing a transcendent space of resistance beyond
discourse, beyond power and beyond the law (p.299).
Throughout the book Kondo argues that
selves were crafted in processes of work and within matrices of power, and those
dichotomic categories such as personal and political, experiential and
theoretical, personal and social, persistent in North American narrative
conventions, were unable to fully account for the complexities and ambiguities
of everyday life (p.300).
Kondo admits that her relatives,
neighbour, friends, and co-workers in Sato factory had showed her that her
implicit, unconscious assumptions about a ‘concept of self’ based on the notion
of referential meaning, and also the neat separability of person from either
‘political’ or ‘theoretical’ were discursively produced which were the sediments
of her own culture and history (p.308).
Comments:
This is a good book to learn about writing
style and research method. It is interesting to note her confession that she
had deviated from the conventions in book writing: putting theoretical
discussion scattered throughout the book, for example the theoretical
discussion on pages 219 to 223. Another deviation from the norm is her writing
style in marshaling analytically the ‘ethnographic’ vignette and anecdotes
(304). I find it interesting to read her story that, while doing shopping for
her family, she had almost failed to recognize her own image as reflected in
the shiny metal surface of the butcher’s display case, by mistaking it as the image of another typical young
Japanese housewife (pp.
16-17). While the story shows how successful Kondo was in blending into the
local community, it also reflects how she at times might become confused with
her identities, and her different ‘selves’.
沒有留言:
張貼留言