Book
title: Nye, Joseph, Jr. 2004. Soft Power: the Means
to Success in World Politics. New York :
Public Affairs.
- ch. 3
– the US
has enormous soft-power resource. But the US is not alone. Others, both
countries and non-state actors also possess soft power that can be used to help
or hinder the US ’s
achievement of its preferred outcomes.(73)(non-state actor – NGO)
- the decade-long economic slowdown of the
1990s tarnished Japan ’s
reputation for economic prowess, but it did not erase the nation’s soft power
resources.(86)But there are also limits to Japan’s soft-power. Japan has never
full come to terms with its record of foreign aggression in the 1930s.(87)
- ch. 4
– military power is to threat and fight. Economic power is used similarly. Soft
power is more difficult to wield, many resources are outside the control of
government, and their effect depends on acceptance by the receiving audience.
(99)
- shaping public opinion becomes even more
important where authoritarian governments have been replaced by new
democracies. Even when foreign leaders are friendly, their leeway may be
limited if their public and parliaments have a negative image of the US and its
policies. (105)
- there are 3 dimensions of public diplomacy.
The first and most immediate dimension is daily communications. Government
tells the press on how to carry out a decision. The second dimension is
strategic communication much like an advertising campaign. For example, the
British tourist authority was busily advertising British tradition, ceremony
and history. The third dimension of public diplomacy is the development of
lasting relationships with key
individual over many years through scholarships, exchanges, training, seminars,
conferences, and access to media
channel.(107-9)
-it is important to remember that the same words
and images that are most successful to
domestic audience may have negative effects on a foreign audience.(112)
- rigid censorship is not always the answer. An
aspect of soft power that the Pentagon got right in the second Gulf war has
been the embedding of reporters with forward military units. This limited
Saddam Hussein’s ability to create international outrage by claiming that
American was deliberately killing civilians. (116)
- democracy is more than voting. It could lead
to “one man, one vote, once” if done
hastily. Since the autocratic regimes in the Middle East
have destroyed their liberal opposition, racial Islamist often represents the
only alternative dissent in many countries. (120)
- ch. 5
– anti-Americanism has increased in the past few years. A widespread and
fashionable view is that the US
is a classically imperialist power. (127) In the US skeptics about soft power
believe that popularity is ephemeral (i.e.
people are forgetful) and should not be a guide for foreign policy in any
cases. The US
can act without the world’s applause. We are so strong that we can do as we
wish. (128)
-power depends on context. We see
that in the global information age, power is distributed among countries in a
pattern that resembles a complex three-dimensional chess game. On the top chess
board of political-military issue, US is in the lead; on the economic board, in
the middle, the US is not a hegemony or an empire. On the bottom chessboard of
transnational relations, power is chaotically dispersed. (136-7)
- many transnational issues such as climate
change, international crime and terrorism cannot be resolved by military force
alone. Representing the dark side of
globalization, these issues were inherently multi-lateral and require
cooperation for their solution. Soft power is particular important in dealing
with these issues. (137)